ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MAHASISWA KELOMPOK ATAS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL STRUKTUR ALJABAR RING MATERI IDEAL PRIMA DAN IDEAL MAKSIMAL

Authors

  • Inayah Rizki Khaesarani Nayah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Siti Maysarah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/jupika.v4i2.1124

Abstract

This study aims to describe the creative thinking ability of upper group students in solving Ring Algebra Structure questions on the prime ideal and maximum ideal material. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. The research subjects are students of Mathematics Education-2 Semester VI who have taken the Ring Algebra Structure course. The research subjects are three (3) students of Mathematics Education-2 Semester VI who have high mathematical abilities based on test results in the form of assignments on Ideal material. The instruments used in the study include: 1) Test; 2) Interview guide; and 3) Documentation. Based on the results of research and discussion, the findings resulted that the thinking ability of upper-class students had fulfilled all aspects of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, and originality. The subject has been able to explain all the indicators that have been set very well and precisely. Subjects have also been able to prove prime ideals or maximum ideals or not both and can identify examples and non-examples of prime ideals and maximum ideals through high-level elaboration and analysis carried out by the subject. Subjects are also very able to describe Lattice diagrams on each question and can determine the subring of a ring. It's just that there is a uniqueness of the worksheet between MS, ZB, and HF. But overall the subject has fulfilled the creative thinking aspect. Thus, it can be concluded that the upper group students can be categorized at level 4, which is very creative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Creative Thinking Ability, Ring Algebra Structure, Ideal Prima, Ideal Maximum

References

Ahmadi, Johan, A., & Kurniasari, I. (2013). Identifikasi Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa dan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. Jurnal MATHEdunesa, 2(2). (Online), (https://goo.gl/8cvTtE) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas, (Online), (https://goo.gl/btMZ9j) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Ikramuddin, & Quraisy, A. (2017). Identifikasi Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar di Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Nabla Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 47-58.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (1989). Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Pembinaan Dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Mahmudi, A. (2008). Mengembangkan Soal Terbuka (Open-Ended Problem) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Makalah tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY. (Online), (https://goo.gl/9YSwHr) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Mahmudi, A. (2010). Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis. Makalah tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY. (Online), (https://goo.gl/mUJZ17) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Maysarah, Siti. (2020). Struktur Aljabar Ring. Jakarta: Kencana.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Munandar, U. (2009). Mengembangkan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Robbins, Stephen P. & Judge, T. A. (2009). Perilaku Organisasi Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rosyid, Abdul. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Struktur Aljabar Ring Materi Ideal. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika). 3(1): 80-94. (Online). (http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/JNPM/article/view/1660) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Rubowo, M. R., dkk. (2017). Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa Tentang Ring Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar 2 Ditinjau Dari Pemikiran Kreatif Pada Siswa Kelompok Atas. Jurnal Silogisme. 2(2): 69-73. (Online), (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340624733) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Sugiyono, (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yee, F. P. (2002). Using Short Open-Ended Mathematics Question to Promote Thinking and Understanding. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education. (Online), (https://goo.gl/1ZMbVs) accessed on 20 Juli 2021.

Yunianta, T. N. H. (2014). Hambatan Seseorang Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Widya Sari, 16(2): 48-60. (Online), (https://goo.gl/FD9UXN) diakses 20 Juli 2021.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-25

How to Cite

Nayah, I. R. K., & Maysarah, S. (2021). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MAHASISWA KELOMPOK ATAS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL STRUKTUR ALJABAR RING MATERI IDEAL PRIMA DAN IDEAL MAKSIMAL. JUPIKA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 4(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.37478/jupika.v4i2.1124